TALKING POINTS
DELAWARE GOP
From Delaware GOP Chair, Julianne Murray

From Delaware GOP Vice Chair, Jim Weldin
Jim Weldin presents
Delaware's open topic podcast where we discuss everything "In The First" State!


CAESAR RODNEY INSTITUTE
CAESAR RODNEY INSTITUTE

A Delaware non-profit committed to protecting individual liberties. Their mission is to educate and inform constituents, legislators, and stakeholders on important issues that impact their livelihood.

Delaware Continues to Meet Federal Air Quality Standards
By David T. Stevenson
Center for Energy & Environmental Policy
March 20, 2025
Contrary to oft-stated comments, Delaware meets all federal air quality standards. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Those standards are reviewed regularly. EPA Administrators make the final decisions and routinely state, “The NAAQS identify what is considered a safe level of each pollutant to breathe, based on the most recent health and medical science, including an adequate margin of safety for those most at risk.” This has been true in the Obama, Trump, and Biden Administrations. Understanding Delaware’s Air Quality The most recent review of the Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) standard was completed on January 16, 2025, so all recent relevant research papers have been considered. There are seven pollutants with standards, but only three are of current concern and emission data is given in Table 1 below. The only reason the particle (PM2.5) results were so high was because we had an extended period of wildfire smoke from Canada in 2023. The 2024 annual average was only 6.91. The EPA has a process for declaring high readings as “Exceptional Events” that can be excluded, but the process to apply is lengthy and expensive, so application is reserved for occasions when these exceptional events lead to failure to meet the standards. Why Are Emission Trends Important? The EPA publishes emission trend data highlighting Delaware easily meets the EPA air quality standards for NO2. See below: Since the peak in 1980, NO2 emissions fell 85% from highway vehicles and 89% from electric generation by 2023. In its 2018 review of the NO2 NAAQS, the EPA stated, “The EPA anticipates that NOX emissions will continue to decrease over the next 20 years” and “currently there are no areas in the United States that are designated as non-attainment for the NO2.” Standards for light-duty vehicle emissions continue to tighten through 2025, and emissions fall as older vehicles exit the market. Our regional electric grid manager, PJM, reports NOX fell 90% from 2005 to 2024, and SO2 fell 96%, and this is a primary precursor for PM2.5. NOTE: There is only one Air Quality Monitor (AQM) that is still monitoring NO2, which is located 900 feet east (downwind) of I-95 on Martin Luther King Blvd. in the heart of Delaware’s most urban location. In 2024, the highest day registered was 45.4 PPB. The three-year annual average from 2022 to 2024 was 19 PPB. The most critical comment on the NAAQS review below was the daily standard should be dropped from 100 PPB, 98th percentile to 50 PPB, 99th percentile, and the annual standard should be dropped to 30 PPB. So, even those standards would have been met. In the 2018 NAAQS review of the primary standards, the Administrator decided to keep the current standards and a just completed EPA review did the same. The American Lung Association Report: Misleading Claims The American Lung Association (ALA) states in its 2024 Air Quality Report, “The NAAQS identify what is considered a safe level of each pollutant to breathe, based on the most recent health and medical science, including an adequate margin of safety for those most at risk.” However, the ALA ignores the EPA’s NAAQS and goes on to create its own pollution standards by: Using the 4th highest day for ozone and the 98 percentile, or the 7th highest day for PM2.5. Focusing on the highest day emissions excluded explicitly by the EPA. Ignoring the issues of high days caused by wildfire smoke that are out of the control of individual states. Ignoring NO2, which has reached such a low level of emissions that only one air quality monitoring station in Delaware continues to measure it. As a result of the above, in the 2024 ALA report, Delaware “grades” were based on 2020-2022 data lists two high ozone days in Kent County, four high days in New Castle County for ozone, and two high PM2.5 days in New Castle County. This resulted in a “B” grade for Kent County, and a “C” grade for New Castle County. Those high readings occurred on just three calendar days in 2021, and all those days had wildfire smoke-related warnings from fires on the West Coast. That smoke reportedly caused health concerns all the way to Europe. High wildfire smoke days should be excluded from the ALA score. The three-year period covered in the report totaled 1,096 days. That means Kent County had a 99.8% positive score and New Castle County had a 99.7% positive score. Both counties should receive an “A.” NOTE: While claims about long-term NO2 pollution exposure leading to childhood asthma still exist, the EPA reviews do not support those claims. The 2018 NAAQS review stated, “Key epidemiologic studies conducted in the U.S. or Canada consistently report associations between long-term NO2 exposures and asthma development in children in locations likely to have violated the current standards over at least parts of study periods, but that those studies do not indicate such associations in locations that would have clearly met the current annual and 1-hour standards.” The Real Threat: Energy Reliability If we are concerned about health impacts, we need to avoid electric power blackouts which have major negative health impacts, and can actually kill people. We need to make sure we have reliable power and putting too much emphasis on unreliable wind and solar power and a carbon tax that doesn’t work will not do that.
Fixing Delaware’s Budget: Smart Solutions for Growth
By Charlie Copeland
Center for Economic & Fiscal Policy
March 5, 2025

Delaware Carbon Taxes have Not Reduced Carbon Dioxide Emissions
By David T. Stevenson
Center for Energy & Environmental Policy
March 17, 2025
.jpg)
What's Up? Let's Act!
ABORTION AS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT
WHAT'S UP?
RELATED
BILLS
SB 5 ABORTION AS A DE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT
SHORT SUMMARY:
Amendment enshrining the right to abortion.
CURRENT STATUS:
Passed in the Senate on 3/11/25
Now in the House assigned to Administration Committee
For the official bill wording and current status on the Delaware General Assembly website, click HERE.
HB 14 CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHT TO PRIVACY
SHORT SUMMARY:
While there are already multiple protections for privacy under Delaware law, recognizing the right to privacy in the Constitution would, among other things, create even more broad protections for abortion.
CURRENT STATUS:
Out of committee, on the READY LIST
Meaning ready to be put on the agenda for debate and vote.
For the official bill wording and current status on the Delaware General Assembly website, click HERE.
NOTE: Constitution Amendments must be passed by a 2/3 vote, not a simple majority in two consecutive legislative sessions. This is the first leg of voting.
WHAT'S UP?
News Release: March 7, 2025
DE Reproductive Freedom Bill AKA
Abortion as a Constitutional Right
Nandi Randolph
Delaware Family Policy Council
Summary: Senate Bill 5 will enshrine sex without consequences directly within the Delaware Constitution. This includes abortion, sterilization, among other things. Analysis: There are a broad number of laws in DelCode that legalize and protect the practice of abortion. Enshrining it directly into the constitution is a radical approach to ensure that it is without limits. The amendment is to create the so-called “right to reproductive freedom.” This phrasing typically points towards abortion, but SB 5 is much more expansive. It seeks to define “reproductive freedom” as “all matters relating to pregnancy,” which includes abortion, contraception, infertility care (such as IVF), and sterilization. This makes the amendment a complete overhaul for sexual freedom. It takes bodily autonomy regarding sexuality to the absolute highest level of protection. Any provision attempted in the future that would hinder sexual, and consequently reproductive, freedom would be difficult to pass and met as a an unconstitutional attack. So protection of the preborn, regulations surrounding IVF, or prevention of the genital mutilation of minors will be practically unstoppable. SB 5 isn’t just the abortion amendment, it’s the sex without consequences amendment. As a constitutional amendment, it will need to be passed by a 2/3 majority in both chambers in 2 consecutive legislative sessions. If the 14 Republicans in the House who have historically voted against abortion maintain their position, it will not have the necessary votes to pass.
Media Release: March 6, 2025
Dozens Show Up to Testify at Abortion Amendment Hearing
Senator Bryant Richardson
Delaware Senate Republicans
On Monday a hearing was held to discuss Senate Bill 5, the first leg of an amendment to the Delaware Constitution regarding what the sponsor called reproductive freedom. I want to commend Senator Marie Pinkney, the chair of the Health & Social Services Committee, for the respectful manner in which she conducted the hearing on Senate Bill 5. The ground rules were laid out early by the Sergeant of Arms who warned against cheering or booing anyone during the discussions. Senator Eric Buckson, committee member, arrived a little late for the hearing. His wife was in a car accident moments before the hearing started. Thankfully she was not injured, but seriously shaken. SB5 sponsor Senator Bryan Townsend said the bill is the first leg of an amendment to the Delaware Constitution to ensure that every Delawarean is afforded reproductive freedom. He listed what the bill considers reproductive freedom, including prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, contraception, sterilization, abortion care, miscarriage management, and infertility care. Most of items listed as reproductive rights in the amendment were mostly non controversial. However, abortion was listed as abortion care. Care? Postpartum care and infertility care I think are appropriate descriptions, but I don’t think abortion has anything to do with ‘care’. I asked Senator Pinkney how much time I had for my testimony. She said that was up to me but to be sensitive to the fact that there were dozens of people signed up to testify. Also showing respect by the committee chair was the three-hour time block allocated for the hearing. That was more than enough time for those signed up to speak following my personal testimony. More than 30 people signed up to speak in person with half a dozen others testifying online. All but four or five spoke out against SB 5. A representative from Planned Parenthood and one from Christiana Care spoke in favor of the bill. Last week I mentioned four women who were not able to testify virtually on Senate Bill 317, the Women’s Right to Know Ultrasound Act. On Monday three of those four women appeared in person to testify. They were: Moria Sheridan, president of the Board of Delaware Right to Life; Bess McAneny, president of Nurses for Life; and Hope Whaley of Laurel. Apostle Herb and Pastor Joy Hill Clendaniel of Glory City Fellowship, an independent church in Delmar were among the few members of the clergy to testify. Evangelist Frank Goehringer of Old Paths Church of Christ gave a heartrending testimony, speaking of holding his stillborn daughter in his hand. Joe Fitzgerald spoke against the bill on behalf of the Catholic Diocese of Wilmington. I would have liked to see more representation from church leadership. I think it would have helped. Most people are not affected by the abortion issue and usually don’t give it a second thought. They don’t think about what in happening inside the walls of the clinics that provide abortions. Why become involved in the discussion if it doesn’t affect you? I think about the stories of the villagers who lived near the concentration camps in Germany. Following the end of World War II, they were taken to the camps and forced to see the horrors that took place inside the buildings. On the way in some in line were acting nonchalant or even joking among themselves. Many were in tears and some collapsed after seeing the horror inside. I think that is what would happen today if they saw the horrors taking place inside the abortion clinics. On Monday my testimony focused on four topics: • Cruel and unusual punishment • Crimes against humanity • The complexity of the human body beginning at conception • Self Defense The Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says that excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. I’ll expand on this next week as I continue to explain the need to defeat Senate Bill 5.
RESOURCES FOR COURAGEOUS CONVERSATIONS
DELAWARE FAMILY POLICY COUNCIL HAS POWERFUL ARTICLES AND VIDEO AT THIS LINK:
https://delawarefamilies.org/protectlife/
The video below is just a sample.
The Pro-Life Reply to "I'm personally Pro-Life, but ..."
Delaware Family Council
LET'S ACT!
CONTACT YOUR SENATOR AND REPRESENTATIVE!
SB1 is the bill to make Abortion a DE Constitutional Right!
It passed the Senate on 3-11 and now is in the hands of the House.
Our local officials need to hear from people in their districts.
Call your official or use the "Send a Message" links for your officials on our ELECTED OFFICIALS page.
Write a Letter to the Editor
1. It is a fundamental violation of human rights to place “reproductive freedom” above human life. It is morally wrong and fundamentally un-American to deny an entire class of human beings – the preborn – the right to life. Protecting adults’ desire to have sex without responsibility, at the expense of the children who are created from that act, has no place in our Constitution! Abortion is already legal in Delaware. SB 5 goes further, and guarantees that Delaware’s preborn will have zero rights in Delaware, permanently. 2. Abortion is NOT healthcare! The entire process is contrary to what true healthcare looks like. Dismembering a child is not healthcare. Lethally injecting a child in the brain is not healthcare. Purposefully stopping a child’s heart is not healthcare. 3. SB 5 has no age limits – it gives limitless “reproductive freedom” to children! Does SB 5 allow children to get an abortion without parental notification? Does SB 5 – which includes “sterilization” – allow children to transition their gender without parental consent, as a fundamental constitutional right? 4. Sterilization as a constitutional right — without regulation — puts individuals at risk. The growing number of detransitioners, along with evidence like the leaked WPATH files and closing gender clinics, tell us that sterilization practices are risky and medically dangerous. Creating a constitutional right to sterilization would prevent the state from protecting children from its irrevocable harm to their bodies.
Talking Points provided by Delaware Family Policy Council
Letter Writing Tips
SPEAK OUT on sussex.gop shares more guidelines and tips for writing an effective Letter to the Editor.
Sussex Media contacts
-
Coastal Point: editorial@coastalpoint.com
-
Cape Gazette: newsroom@capegazette.com
-
Seaford and Laurel Star: mmclure@mspublications.com
-
Sussex Post: sussexpost@newszap.com
-
Coast Press: dcp@dmg.gannett.com
-
The Wave: wave@dmg.gannett.com
Pray for Delaware's Preborn!
For information on the group holding vigils at the Seaford Abortion Clinic, click HERE.

What's Up? Let's Act!
PROTECT OUR KIDS
WHAT'S UP?
RELATED
BILLS
ACTIVE
BILLS
HB 46 REQUIRED PARENTAL CONSENT FOR ABORTION
SHORT SUMMARY:
Minors under that age of 16 will be required to obtain parental consent for abortions, rather than just the current 24hr notification in DelCode.
CURRENT STATUS:
3/25/25 Motion to release from committee FAILED
For the official bill wording and more on status on the Delaware General Assembly website, click HERE.
SB 55 SAFE ACT
SHORT SUMMARY:
Healthcare providers are prohibited from performing any sort of gender transition procedures on minors.
CURRENT STATUS:
Senate, awaiting consideration in committee which may be indefinitely.
For the official bill wording and current status on the Delaware General Assembly website, click HERE.
HB 32 SCHOOL
RESOURCE OFFICER FUNDING
SHORT SUMMARY:
Funds at least 1 School Resource Officer in each school in a school district and in each charter school, regardless of enrollment, and provides for additional school officers for schools with over 1,000 students.
CURRENT STATUS:
Motion to release from committee failed.
For the official bill wording and current status on the Delaware General Assembly website, click HERE.
WHAT'S UP?
Media Release: March 20, 2025
From Delaware Family Policy Council
This bill represents a significant step toward protecting the sanctity of life and affirming the God-given responsibility of parents to guide and care for their children. HB 46 would ensure that minors under the age of 16 do not make life-altering decisions in isolation or under coercion. Currently, minors under 16 are only required to provide parental notification within 24 hours, which may be bypassed. Minors 16 and older require no parental involvement at all. The ability for judicial bypass that remains in HB 46 takes into account the US Supreme Court case, Bellotti v. Baird (1979) that required there be a waiver to consent requirements if there are extenuating circumstances. Such circumstances are maintained in HB 46 and are for abuse, neglect, or coercion. The Court must also respond within 5 calendar days, as listed in the previous law. HB 46 also prohibits any sort of referral fees and requires that those who provide consent or assess the minor’s situation are independent from abortion providers. This ensures decisions are made with the minor’s best interest in mind and not influenced by financial incentives. Laws regarding abortion for minors have consistently moved towards removal parental authority and allowing the undeveloped minor to make decisions for themselves, regardless of their inability to cognitively process the depth of such decisions. HB 46 would effectively turn in the opposite direction, protecting young girls from lifelong decisions without the support of their families.
Media Release: March 20, 2025
Senator Richardson Expresses Disappointment as Senate Bill 55 Fails to Advance
Senator Bryant Richardson
Delaware Senate Republicans
DOVER, DE — Despite compelling testimony from medical experts and detransitioners, Senate Bill 55 (SB 55) failed to clear the committee process Wednesday after the Senate Health and Social Services Committee, controlled by Democrats, refused to release the bill for consideration by the full Senate. SB 55, also known as the Delaware Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act, aimed to protect children from irreversible medical procedures by prohibiting gender transition treatments for minors. The bill’s supporters, including medical professionals and individuals who have detransitioned, provided testimony on the long-term risks and potential harm of such procedures. However, the committee opted to block the bill, disregarding their expert insights. Senator Bryant Richardson (R-Seaford), the bill’s prime sponsor, expressed deep disappointment over the decision but affirmed his commitment to advocating for children’s well-being in Delaware. “The challenge for this bill was to introduce overwhelming evidence about the dangers to youth who are subjected to gender transition procedures and to dispel biased and inaccurate information from those who profit from providing treatments," Senator Richardson said. “Having the most current factual information available is crucial when it comes to deciding the best course of action for protecting the development of our youth.” "The purpose of SB 55 was to protect vulnerable children from making life-altering medical decisions before they are mature enough to fully comprehend the risks," Senator Richardson continued. “How do you explain the long-term risks to a 12-year-old?” The senator noted there are facts that cannot be denied, but unfortunately failed to convince the committee members. According to the best studies—the ones that even transgender activists themselves cite—80 to 95 percent of children with gender dysphoria will come to identify with and embrace their bodily sex. Forty-one percent of people who identify as transgender will attempt suicide at some point in their lives, compared to 4.6 percent of the general population. People who have had transition surgery are 19 times more likely than average to die by suicide. “I believe the tide is turning against giving youth chemicals and surgeries, but those who profit from providing treatments will not give up easily,” said Senator Richardson. “In just a relatively short period of time, gender dysphoria has become a widespread problem. It is spreading as a social virus and infecting the minds of young people in search of acceptance. When a child is struggling with their identity, they should not be subjected to irreversible harm from hormones and surgeries.”
Media Release: March 6, 2025
SRO bill fails committee,
Shupe will not quit
Representative Bryan Shupe
Delaware House Republicans
Our bill to fund SROs (School Resource Officers) or constables in schools did not make it through the committee level. This legislation would have ensured that every school in Delaware had access to SROs or constables—enhancing safety for teachers and students, while also fostering positive relationships between students and law enforcement in our schools and communities. Unfortunately, the bill failed along party lines, with only one Democrat supporting this critical measure for school safety. While I’m disappointed that school safety isn’t a top priority for the Education Committee at this time, I remain committed to finding solutions. I’ll continue to advocate for measures that protect our students, staff, and schools—and work to bring them to the floor and, ultimately, to the Governor’s desk. School safety cannot wait.
LET'S ACT!
CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVE!
VOTE YES ON HB 46
Use the easy link from the Delaware Family Policy Council to send your mesage. Click HERE
or
Call your official or use the "Send a Message" links for your officials on our ELECTED OFFICIALS page.
Write a Letter to the Editor
Letter Writing Tips
SPEAK OUT on sussex.gop shares more guidelines and tips for writing an effective Letter to the Editor.
Sussex Media contacts
-
Coastal Point: editorial@coastalpoint.com
-
Cape Gazette: newsroom@capegazette.com
-
Seaford and Laurel Star: mmclure@mspublications.com
-
Sussex Post: sussexpost@newszap.com
-
Coast Press: dcp@dmg.gannett.com
-
The Wave: wave@dmg.gannett.com
What's Up? Let's Act!
ASSISTED SUICIDE
WHAT'S UP?
ACTIVE
BILL
SHORT SUMMARY:
The bill permits an adult resident of Delaware to be prescribed pills to self-administer to end their life.
CURRENT STATUS:
Passed in the House
Assigned to Executive Committee in the Senate
For the official bill wording and current status on the Delaware General Assembly website, click HERE.
HB 140
ASSISTED
SUICIDE
News Release: March 22, 2025
Physician-Assisted Suicide Bill Squeaks by the House, Heads to the Senate
Delaware House Republicans
A bill seeking to legalize physician-assisted suicide cleared the House on Tuesday with a minimum of 21 votes, sending the controversial measure to the Senate for consideration. House Bill 140 is sponsored by State Rep. Eric Morrison (D-Glasgow). It seeks to create a multi-step process allowing Delawareans with a life expectancy of less than six months to obtain and self-administer a lethal dosage of a prescribed drug. Under the bill, a designated medical professional must confirm that the patient seeking suicide could make an informed, rational, and voluntary decision. Individuals seeking this option must be presented with all available alternatives, including comfort care, hospice care, and pain control. The process would also include two waiting periods. The bill would not allow anyone to request the fatal dosage on behalf of another. Proponents maintain that assisted suicide allows terminally ill patients to end their lives at a time and place of their choosing while potentially avoiding a painful, prolonged death. House Republicans opposed the bill, objecting to perceived flaws in the process and noting troubling issues that have arisen in other jurisdictions were the practice has been legalized. State Rep. Jeff Hilovsky (R-Long Neck, Oak Orchard), in photo, cited the example of Canada, which enacted a physician assisted suicide law in 2016. In its first year, 1,018 people chose to end their lives under the program. According to the most recent statistics, 15,343 people received suicide assistance in 2023--about one out of every 20 deaths in the country that year. "That's an increase of 1,507%," Rep. Hilovsky told the chamber. "That is just an incredible amount." He said he believed the rapid increase is symptomatic of a growing societal acceptance of devaluing the lives of certain people. State Rep. Rich Collins (R-Millsboro), who spent a career in the insurance industry, said he feared an assisted suicide law would lead to coercion of the elderly. "I had clients that I was absolutely convinced wanted their parents to die so they could get the money. When you have older folks that have money...and their children desperately need it, don't think [they won't use this law to get it]." State Rep. Valerie Jones Giltner (R-Georgetown) said she views the bill as a slippery-slope issue. She said should it become law, she believes its scope would be quickly expanded to include non-terminal conditions. Citing a conversation she had with a handicapped man in the chamber just prior to the debate, she said people with costly medical needs could easily feel pressured into opting for physician-assisted suicide to give their families financial relief. Rep. Jones Giltner's argument is bolstered by a recent column authored by Drs. Mark S. Komrad, MD & Annette Hanson, MD in the journal Psychiatric Times. It noted: "While we recognize that individuals of good conscience may differ on the ethics of physician-assisted suicide, we have consistently maintained—as the American Medical Association has opined—that it is fundamentally incompatible with the physician’s role as healer, would be difficult or impossible to control, and would pose serious societal risks...Despite such clear statements, we and others have called attention to the ever-expanding eligibility criteria for physician-assisted suicide/euthanasia, particularly in Canada, Belgium, and the Netherlands. In essence, every one of these foreign jurisdictions that has legalized physician-assisted suicide/euthanasia has eventually expanded them...The expansion typically begins with...end-stage or terminal illness and gradually broadens to “chronic, nonterminal, or treatment-refractory illness." House Bill 140 is pending action in the Senate Executive Committee, from which it is expected to win release.
News Release: March 15, 2025
Physician-Assisted Suicide Bill on Tuesday's House Agenda
Delaware House Republicans
A bill seeking to make Delaware the 11th state in the nation to legalize physician-assisted suicide is on the House Agenda for Tuesday. The Ron Silverio/Heather Block End of Life Options Act (House Bill 140) was released from committee in January. Governor John Carney vetoed nearly identical legislation last September. The bill had squeaked through the General Assembly in 2024, garnering the minimum number of votes needed for passage in both the House and the Senate. Sponsored by State Rep. Eric Morrison (D-Glasgow), the current incarnation of the bill would create a multi-step process allowing Delawareans with a life expectancy of less than six months to obtain and self-administer a lethal dosage of a prescribed drug. Under the bill, a designated medical professional must confirm that the patient seeking suicide could make an informed, rational, and voluntary decision. Individuals seeking this option must be presented with all available alternatives, including comfort care, hospice care, and pain control. The process would also include two waiting periods. The bill would not allow anyone to request the fatal dosage on behalf of another. Proponents maintain that assisted suicide allows terminally ill patients to die with dignity, avoiding the pain of a lingering illness while getting sound medical advice and ending their lives at a time and place of their choosing. Opponents, including House Republicans, say assisted suicide potentially makes vulnerable patients subject to coercion, undermines the life-affirming mission of physicians, and represents a societal slippery slope that will lead to suicide as being an acceptable option for non-terminal conditions. The bill's inclusion on the House Agenda is a strong indication it will be brought to the floor for a vote on Tuesday, but it does not guarantee that it will occur.
Legislative Update: February 3, 2025
HB 140 | Assisted Suicide
DE Family Policy Council
Summary: House Bill 140 would allow doctors to prescribe death pills to potentially terminally ill patients, thus legalizing assisted suicide. Analysis: Rep. Paul Baumbach has led the charge to legalize assisted suicide for years. This past year, the assisted suicide bill passed both chambers for the first time. Governor Carney recognized the large number of questions still present on the issue and chose to veto the bill, preventing it from becoming law. Rep. Baumbach is retired, and he gave the mantle of legalizing assisted suicide to Rep. Eric. Morrison. HB 140 includes supposed “safeguards” to respond to concerns with previous versions of this bill. However, it must be noted that many of these safeguards have already been challenged in court and removed in other states. More importantly, human life has inherent dignity and value because we are created in God’s Image. Period. This doesn’t change because a doctor or legislator says it does. HB 140 assumes that doctors can make an accurate terminal diagnosis. In reality, doctors have been wrong in over 66% of cases! The bill’s supporters claim that HB 140 is an extension to palliative care, but this is a stark contradiction. Palliative care is intended to alleviate pain and make the patient comfortable; the intent is not to kill. HB 140 is not managing pain; it is prematurely causing certain death. This is not compassion – it’s assisting in suicide.
Legislative Update: January 30, 2025
New Leadership and Assisted Suicide in the House
DE Family Policy Council
There was no episode last week as things have been moving more slowly than usual in the legislative department. However, today’s topic will revisit a significant development from last week that could have major implications for our ongoing fight against assisted suicide in Delaware. As of January 21st, we have new leadership in the governor’s office. Matt Meyer has officially taken office as Delaware’s 75th Governor, and Kyle Evans Gay is our new Lt. Governor. Now, you might be thinking: what does this have to do with the fight against assisted suicide? Well, these two figures—though part of the executive branch—have the potential to play huge roles in shaping the outcome of this ongoing battle. Let’s rewind for a moment and look at where we were last year when assisted suicide made its way to the Senate for the first time in almost a decade. It’s important to understand the process in order to grasp how crucial the role of our new Governor and Lt. Governor could be in the future. To pass a bill in the Delaware Senate, all that’s needed is a simple majority—11 out of 21 senators need to vote in favor. Last year, the assisted suicide bill reached the Senate, and it came down to a very close vote. The vote initially landed at 9-9, with two senators absent. Those two missing votes were assumed to be key in making the count 10-10, which would have created a tie. Now, when it’s a tie vote, that’s where the Lt. Governor comes in. The Lt. Governor is granted the power to cast the deciding vote in the event of a tie. So, if Senator Hoffner, who had previously abstained, chose not to vote again, it could very well have led to a 10-10 deadlock. The stakes were incredibly high, and we were on the edge of our seats. But here’s where things took an unexpected turn. Senator Hoffner, who had abstained the first time, ultimately voted in favor of the bill, and that pushed it through with a narrow 11-10 vote. That bill was then sent to Governor Carney’s desk, where it faced a veto. But, as we know, the legislature didn’t have enough votes to override that veto.
LET'S ACT!
CONTACT YOUR SENATOR AND REPRESENTATIVE!
HB 140 would allow doctors to prescribe death pills to potentially terminally ill patients, thus legalizing assisted suicide.
Legalized Assisted Suicide (HB140) was pushed back in DE for 10 years.
It’s back – it passed the House by one vote on Tuesday, March 18th.
House Bill 140 will allow doctors to prescribe death pills to patients. It was pushed back in DE for the past 10 years, in large part because of people like you who took action.
We need you again! Ask your Senator below today to vote NO! It’ll take less than 5 minutes.
Call your official or use the "Send a Message" links for your officials on our ELECTED OFFICIALS page.
Use Delaware Family Policy Council Link Below to Contact Your Senator


LET'S ACT!
Write a Letter to the Editor
Talking Points provided by Delaware Family Policy Council
1. Assisted suicide pills are experimental and do NOT guarantee a painless death. Dr. Neil Kaye testified in previous legislative committees that 33% who took the death pills took 30 hours to die. Dr. Neil Kaye also testified that the concoction of drugs used in assisted suicide changes frequently. Research from death penalty executions show that the drugs used to kill can cause the lungs to fill with fluid, basically causing people to drown to death. Assisted suicide doesn’t even accomplish its stated goal based on data from the states where it is legal. 2. Suicide is not healthcare or palliative care! It is not the prescription for pain relief. Palliative care is meant to manage pain. Assisted suicide gives Delaware’s health care system the shortcut of ending patient’s lives. Pain is not the main reason that patients choose assisted suicide. Oregon data from 2023 cited “loss of autonomy and dignity” and “fear of burdening loved ones” as the main reasons for assisted suicide. Legalizing assisted suicide says that some lives are not valuable. 3. Assisted suicide creates a culture where there is more incentive to kill than to care. The American Medical Association says, “Physician-assisted suicide is fundamentally incompatible with the physician’s role as healer, would be difficult or impossible to control, and would pose serious societal risks. Instead of participating in assisted suicide, physicians must aggressively respond to the needs of patients at the end of life.” This will destroy the integrity of the medical system that is designed to save life rather than end it.
Letter Writing Tips
SPEAK OUT on sussex.gop shares more guidelines and tips for writing an effective Letter to the Editor.
Sussex Media contacts
-
Coastal Point: editorial@coastalpoint.com
-
Cape Gazette: newsroom@capegazette.com
-
Seaford and Laurel Star: mmclure@mspublications.com
-
Sussex Post: sussexpost@newszap.com
-
Coast Press: dcp@dmg.gannett.com
-
The Wave: wave@dmg.gannett.com

What's Up? Let's Act!
ENERGY & RISING POWER BILLS
A number of bills have been introduced by both Republicans and Democrats affecting our Energy Future.
These are the key bills:
HB 50 Create Delaware Energy Fund by Redirecting Funds to Supplement the Existing Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program" ON READY LIST
HB 80 Roll Back 'Renewable Profolio Standard' (RPS) to 10% from 20%" IN COMMITTEE
SCR 18 Create the Delaware Nuclear Energy Feasibility Task Force PASSED SENATE 3/26 - ON TO HOUSE
SB 64 Rebate Green Energy Fees to Consumers (withdrawn/not submitted in the face of HB 50)
SB 65 Remove Delaware from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative IN COMMITTEE
For the official status and official version of bill wording on the Delaware General Assembly website, click HERE then enter a bill number. NOTE: The status may have changed since the above was updated.
For two perspectives on these bills you are encouraged to read the March 12th piece from our Republican legislators and the March 23 opinion piece from Michelle Parsons
WHAT'S UP?
ACTIVE
BILLS
Opinion: March 23, 2025
DNREC Money Laundering and 2026 Brown Outs
Michelle Parsons,
RDC 38th District Republican Club, PAC
ENERGY BILLS
Delaware imports over 6 MILLION mega watt hours of energy to cover needs and we still have to cut back during peak hours so not to overload the grid/cause energy prices to spike. The Indian River Plant only had ONE operational unit out of 4 and still out did 10,000 solar installations. BROWN OUTS ARE COMING 2026!
REPUBLICAN Energy Bills
SB 65: Removes us from RGGI (green deal) so that Delaware is not mandated to get our energy from non-existent sources of green energy. Eliminates the fine for Delaware failing to comply with green mandates. Could bring power plants back online until other forms of energy generation is up and running (like nuclear or natural gas which would still be clean enough to remain under allotted level of CO2 emissions.)
SB 64: Directs money from sale of CO2 emissions credits back to rate payers, lowering bills.
SCR 18: Beginning of bringing about nuclear in a safer way through SMRs and advanced technologies. A reliable and constant source of power that will promote Delaware's energy independence.
DEMOCRAT Energy Bills
Democrats essentially created a new tax by creating fines that Delmarva Power must pay and pass on to consumers, that gets paid to DNREC, aka money laundering, to funnel money into the Green Energy Fund that would:
-
Pay for STATEWIDE low income assistance programs, and
-
Build green energy infrastructure – solar, wind, EV’s.
HB 50: Takes 65% of the money Delaware makes off the auction of CO2 emissions credits and gives it to the Sustainable Energy Utility (building wind & solar) and gives 15 % to the low-income fund (350% below poverty level). NOTHING for working families who don't make the cutoff for income.
SB 59: Switches the standard for which rate increases are approved from the business judgment rule to the "business prudence" rule. Would allow the public service commission to deny rate increases if found to be "unjust, unreasonable, imprudent, or unjustly discriminatory, or in any wise in violation of law." **This was stolen legislation already written by Republican lawmakers.
WHAT'S UP?
Media Release: March 28, 2025
SCR 18 Passes During
This Week’s Session
This week, the Delaware Senate took an important step toward securing a more reliable, affordable, and sustainable energy future for our state. I was pleased that SCR 18, which creates the Delaware Nuclear Energy Feasibility Task Force, passed with bipartisan support. This task force will examine the potential role of small modular reactors in Delaware’s energy portfolio and explore whether nuclear energy can help stabilize costs and improve reliability for families and businesses. I thank the 13 Senate Democrats who voted in favor of this resolution and recognize their willingness to put good policy ahead of partisanship. Energy policy is too important to be dictated by politics, and this week’s vote shows that there is broad support for having serious discussions about Delaware’s energy future. As SCR 18 moves to the House of Representatives, the Senate Republicans look forward to continuing this bipartisan effort. If House leadership believes a broader approach is necessary, I am open to working together to expand the scope while ensuring nuclear energy remains part of the conversation. Delawareans deserve practical solutions that prioritize affordable energy. An inordinate amount of time went into preparing this concurrent resolution from our Republican staff. I was pleased to have Senator Stephanie Hansen as a co prime on this bill. Stephanie Hansen has devoted much of her time to help solve the problems associated with making sure Delawareans have an adequate supply of power now and in the future while making sure our environment is protected. The potential for nuclear power to meet the increasing demand for power is being recognized throughout the nation. Small modular reactors are advanced nuclear reactors that have about one-third of the generating capacity of traditional nuclear power reactors but a significantly smaller footprint. In Oregon, a dozen nuclear bills were introduced during this session. Two of them call for studies. Two others would lift a 1980 moratorium on building new nuclear projects — one requires voter approval and the other would simply repeal it. Competition among states for wooing the nuclear power industry is intensifying. Texas has thrown its hat into the ring with a far-reaching bill to speed the permitting process and develop nuclear manufacturing. The bill would create the Texas Advanced Nuclear Energy Authority to help guide industry development. The measure establishes a Texas Nuclear Permitting Office to provide a single point of contact for advanced nuclear reactor developers and associated businesses to navigate permitting. Senate Concurrent Resolution 18 has these objectives. (1) Assess the technical and logistical feasibility of deploying Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) in Delaware, including identifying suitable locations, evaluating existing energy infrastructure, and determining necessary upgrades for grid integration. (2) Analyze the long-term economic benefits and costs of SMR deployment, comparing nuclear energy pricing to other energy sources, evaluating job creation potential, and assessing local economic impacts. (3) Examine how SMRs can enhance Delaware’s energy independence, reduce reliance on electricity imports, stabilize pricing, and provide reliable baseload power compared to intermittent renewable energy sources. (4) Identify necessary changes to Delaware’s laws and regulations to facilitate SMR development, review federal and state permitting requirements, and explore strategies to include nuclear energy in the energy mix for Delaware, including but not limited to, nuclear energy credits and clean energy standards or requirements. (5) Assess the environmental benefits and potential risks of SMR deployment, including its ability to reduce carbon emissions, its environmental footprint compared to other energy sources, and public health concerns related to safety, waste disposal, and emergency preparedness.
Media Release: March 12, 2025
Four Bills to Protect
Delawareans’ Energy Welfare
House and Senate Republican legislators, including State Rep. Jesse Vanderwende, are sponsoring a package of four bills to reform Delaware’s energy policies. “The bills we’re promoting in this package are not a panacea for the high electricity bills many consumers are now experiencing and are likely to see again this summer," said Joseph Fulgham, Chief of Policy & Communications for the House Republican Caucus. "Still, they will help to correct our state’s course and avoid even larger problems in the future.” 10 & 10 The Renewable Portfolio Standard--the percentage of electricity that utilities must source from renewables--is presently set at 25% and will increase annually, topping out at 40% in 2035. “Delaware does not have enough renewable energy to meet the current mandate, let alone the future,” said State Rep. Mike Smith (R-Pike Creek Valley). “But our state allows utilities that can’t hit the mark to buy their way out of it by paying a state fee. In each of the last two years, Delmarva Power has paid about $13 million annually in these compliance fees—costs it has passed along to consumers." This proposal would roll back the Renewable Portfolio Standard to 10% and freeze it there for 10 years, providing time for more renewables to come online and giving ratepayers some needed relief. Pull the Plug Under state regulations adopted despite massive public opposition, automakers will be required to deliver an increasing number of zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) for sale in Delaware starting one year from this fall. Beginning in Fall 2026, 43% of new cars and trucks sent from manufacturers to Delaware dealerships will be required to be ZEVs. The percentage will increase annually, culminating at 82% in 2032. According to the most recent U.S. Department of Energy data, ZEVs continue to have limited appeal in Delaware. That year, there were 35,000 registered ZEVs and more than 805,000 fuel-powered vehicles. This bill would eliminate the mandate. “Our state is already struggling to update its electricity distribution systems, with ratepayers picking up the tab," said the measure's prime sponsor, State Rep. Lyndon Yearick (R-Camden, Wyoming). "We shouldn’t be forcing people into cars they don’t want to drive and adding insult by making them pay higher electricity bills to build a support infrastructure for these vehicles.” Boringly Dependable PJM Interconnection, the operators of the regional power grid serving Delaware, have sounded the alarm for the last several years. The organization has reported that fossil fuel power plants that provide sustainable, reliable power have been rapidly retired due to political and economic factors. Renewable energy facilities have not been built fast enough to replace them and can’t be counted on to provide power when it is most needed. The result has reduced supply in the face of rising demand. “The answer is boring,” said State Rep. Kevin Hensley (R-Townsend, Odessa, Port Penn). “We should embrace combined-cycle power plants using natural gas and steam turbines. It’s a dull but proven technology that is highly efficient, relatively clean and quiet, and can be brought online quickly to meet demand. Delaware imports up to half of its electricity. Building these plants here could cut the power lost through transmission, increase local security, and reduce distribution costs.” The feds recently authorized PJM to prioritize connecting such plants to its grid. Rep. Hensley’s proposal would encourage plant construction by giving operators significant tax breaks. Eliminating the Tax You Didn’t Know You Were Paying Delaware belongs to a group of 11 states called the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative that was formed to cut carbon dioxide emissions. In these states, power plants using fossil fuels must buy an “allowance” to emit CO2. These costs are quietly passed along to ratepayers, with Delaware using its share of the proceeds to subsidize renewable energy and efficiency programs. "Delaware has already surpassed the original emissions reduction goals set by RGGI, yet our residents and businesses continue to bear the burden of higher electricity costs,” said State Sen. Gerald Hocker (R-Ocean View). “It’s time to step away from a program that no longer serves its intended purpose and instead focus on policies that promote economic growth and energy affordability." The proposal by Sen. Hocker and State Rep. Bryan Shupe (R-Milford South) would remove Delaware from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, eliminating this hidden tax imposed on Delawareans.
News Release: March 7, 2025
DE Senate Bill 65 Introduced to Remove Delaware from
the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI)
Delaware Senate Republicans
DOVER – Senate Republican Leader Gerald Hocker (R-Ocean View) and Representative Bryan Shupe (R-Milford) have introduced Senate Bill 65 (SB 65), legislation that would remove Delaware from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). The bill aims to provide relief to Delaware households and businesses burdened by rising energy costs. Delaware initially joined RGGI to reduce carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions, with a target of a 10% reduction by 2019. Despite having far surpassed this goal, the state remains in RGGI while Delawareans continue to face some of the highest electricity costs in the region. Lawmakers argue this has negatively impacted economic growth and affordability. "Delaware has done its part in reducing emissions, yet families and businesses are still paying the price for a program that has outlived its purpose,” said Senator Gerald Hocker. “It’s time to remove this unnecessary burden and ensure that energy remains affordable for all Delawareans." Representative Bryan Shupe, the bill’s House prime sponsor, echoed these concerns, highlighting the economic impact of high energy costs. "When energy prices are artificially inflated by government mandates, it slows business growth and reduces job opportunities,” said Shupe. “We can protect our environment while also making Delaware a more competitive place to live and work." SB 65 has been assigned to the Senate Environment, Energy, & Transportation Committee and is expected to receive a hearing in the coming weeks.
News Release: February 28, 2025
Delaware’s Energy Crisis:
The Cost of Mandates and Our Plan for Relief
Delaware Senate Republicans
For too long, Delawareans have been saddled with ever-increasing electricity costs due to misguided energy policies. The burden falls hardest on working families, seniors on fixed incomes, and small businesses struggling to keep up. While the push for renewable energy is well-intended, the reality is that Delaware’s current mandates have led to higher costs, unreliable supply, and an overdependence on imported energy. Our caucus has heard from countless constituents who are facing unsustainable electricity bills, and we are committed to taking action. After meeting with stakeholders in the energy sector, it has become clear that Delaware’s green energy mandates, including its participation in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), are key drivers of these rising costs. These policies, rather than fostering a balanced and sustainable energy portfolio, have forced Delaware to rely on expensive imported electricity while discouraging investment in traditional energy generation within our own state. The Reality of Delaware’s Energy Policies At a recent committee meeting, DNREC’s State Energy Office confirmed that Delaware now has 10,000 solar installations producing 241 MW of energy. While this is an achievement, it is still far below the 410 MW that the now-retired Indian River Power Plant generated. Despite requiring utilities to meet aggressive Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards (RPS), Delmarva Power has been unable to purchase enough Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) to comply with these mandates. Instead, the company has paid $26 million in compliance fees over the past two years—costs that have been passed directly to ratepayers. While some argue that the increased costs on monthly utility bills are minimal, they are anything but for seniors, single parents, and working families already struggling with inflation and economic uncertainty. Our Plan for Relief We are introducing a series of bills to correct course and bring relief to Delaware’s ratepayers: Senate Bill 64: This legislation would redirect RGGI revenues back to ratepayers instead of funneling millions into government-controlled programs. New Hampshire has successfully implemented a similar policy, providing much-needed relief to their residents. Senate Bill 65: Senator Hocker will introduce legislation to withdraw Delaware from RGGI altogether. While reducing emissions is important, it should not come at the expense of affordability and reliability. Senate Concurrent Resolution 18: Sponsored by Senator Richardson, this resolution creates a task force to investigate the feasibility of nuclear power in Delaware. As energy costs continue to rise and reliability concerns persist, it is essential to explore all available options, including nuclear energy, to ensure a stable and affordable energy future for Delawareans. Future Legislation: Additional measures are currently being drafted and will be introduced in the near future to further address the instability and high costs caused by Delaware’s current energy policies. A Call for Balanced Energy Policy Our caucus supports an all-of-the-above energy strategy—one that includes renewable sources, but also recognizes the need for traditional energy sources such as coal to maintain reliability and affordability. The state should not be setting unattainable goals that only serve to penalize businesses and residents. We must focus on policies that balance environmental responsibility with economic reality. As we move forward, we encourage our colleagues on both sides of the aisle to put Delawareans first. Our constituents deserve an energy policy that is reliable, sustainable, and, most importantly, affordable. We will continue to fight for solutions that provide real relief while ensuring Delaware’s energy future is secure.
Media Release: February 27, 2025
Senator Bryant Richardson Introduces Resolution to Explore Nuclear Energy in Delaware
Delaware Senate Republicans
State Senator Bryant Richardson has introduced Senate Concurrent Resolution 18 (SCR 18) to establish the Delaware Nuclear Energy Feasibility Task Force, an effort aimed at evaluating the potential benefits and challenges of incorporating nuclear energy, specifically Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), into Delaware's energy portfolio. State Representative Jeff Hilovsky serves as the co-prime sponsor of the resolution in the house. As Delaware faces growing concerns over energy reliability, cost, and sustainability, SCR 18 seeks to explore the feasibility of SMRs as a long-term solution to enhance the state's energy independence and stabilize pricing. Currently, Delaware imports a significant portion of its electricity, increasing costs and emissions due to transmission inefficiencies. "Nuclear energy, and specifically SMRs, presents an opportunity to provide Delaware with a stable, reliable, and carbon-free source of power" said Senator Richardson. "By exploring this option, we can determine whether nuclear energy has a place in Delaware's future and ensure that our residents and businesses have access to affordable and dependable electricity." SMRs offer several advantages over traditional nuclear plants, including enhances safety measures, reduced land requirements, and lower cooling water needs. The task force will assess the viability of deploying SMRs in Delaware by examining potential locations, economic impacts, regulatory requirements, and environmental considerations. "As our state looks for sustainable and cost-effective energy solutions, it's important that we evaluate every viable options" said Representative Hilovsky. "This task force will provide the necessary research to determine whether clean nuclear energy can play a role in securing Delaware's energy future while supporting economic growth and job creation." The task force will consist of representatives from the public and private sectors, including energy experts, environmental specialists, business leaders, and policymakers. The findings and recommendations will be compiled into a final report, which will be submitted to the General Assembly and the Governor by October 31, 2025.
News Release: February 14, 2025
Think Your Electric Bill Was High? Here’s What’s Coming
By David T. Stevenson
Center for Energy & Environmental Policy
Sorry about those high electric bills, but nothing has really changed in the last few months except the weather. Higher costs have been sneaking up for decades, and wait until you see what's coming next. Those bills didn't just get high overnight. In 2008, legislation was passed that, along with more recent amendments, mandates increasing requirements for wind and solar power, and creates a carbon tax on in-state power plants. Thanks to efforts by the Caesar Rodney Institute, these costs are itemized on your electric bills if you are a Delmarva Power customer, making it easier to see exactly where your money is going. These line items include:
LET'S ACT!
CONTACT YOUR SENATOR AND REPRESENTATIVE!
Our local officials need to hear from people in their districts.
Call your official or use the "Send a Message" links for your officials on our ELECTED OFFICIALS page.

File A Complaint
The public can can file a complaint with the Delaware Public Advocates here: publicadvocate.delaware.gov
Write a Letter to the Editor
Sample Letter
Here is a sample letter written by a Delaware Republican Grassroots member. If you would like to join the Delaware Republican Grassroots email chain, email Joyce Hoover.
"Electric costs are much too high. We need to have less or no wind and solar power which are high-cost and unreliable. We need more natural gas, nuclear, and coal. The cost of fuel cell electricity is outrageous. Delaware needs more in-state generation and less reliance on out-of-state and so-called renewables which aren't reliable. Air quality in Delaware meets all air quality standards and does not justify high-cost, unreliable, low-capacity-factor renewables. Delaware CO2 emissions are approximately 0.03% of total global CO2 emissions and do not affect climate. The idea that Delaware needs to lead the way on renewables for climate change is ridiculous Virtue Signaling. The job of the Public Advocate is to protect the public from high costs, not to approve them. Please advocate against the high-cost renewable policies and for common sense lower-cost energy for Delaware. We need to stop this nonsense and restore common sense for Delaware. Thank you." Use these key phrases as often as you can, to continue to hammer the common message that the left is out of touch, not good for Delaware and how we can help Delaware out of her dark age.
Letter Writing Tips
SPEAK OUT on sussex.gop shares more guidelines and tips for writing an effective Letter to the Editor.
Sussex Media contacts
-
Coastal Point: editorial@coastalpoint.com
-
Cape Gazette: newsroom@capegazette.com
-
Seaford and Laurel Star: mmclure@mspublications.com
-
Sussex Post: sussexpost@newszap.com
-
Coast Press: dcp@dmg.gannett.com
-
The Wave: wave@dmg.gannett.com


See more on updates on Energy in the section above for Caesar Rodney Institute
What's Up? Let's Act!
GUN RIGHTS
WHAT'S UP?
ACTIVE
BILL
HB 45
"FIREARMS MERCHANT CODE"
SHORT SUMMARY:
The bill requires credit card companies to use a new merchant code to distinguish firearm retailers from other retailers, potentially allowing the existence of a list or registry of privately owned firearms in the state.
CURRENT STATUS:
Out of committee in the House on 3/7/2025
On the "Ready List" meaning it is ready to be put on the agenda for debate and vote.
For the official bill wording and current status on the Delaware General Assembly website, click HERE.

WHAT'S UP?
News Release: March 15, 2025
Controversial "Firearms Merchant Code" Bill Clears Committee, Heads to House
Delaware House Republicans
On a party-line vote, Democratic lawmakers released a bill from committee on Wednesday to require credit card companies to use a new “merchant category code” (MCC) that would generically identify purchases made at businesses specializing in the sale of firearms and ammunition. Here are some notes from the hearing: State Rep. Krista Griffith (D-Fairfax) is the co-prime sponsor of House Bill 45. She was also the prime sponsor of the Delaware Personal Data Privacy Act (enacted in 2023), which provides Delawareans with certain protections regarding the use of digitally collected information. However, she indicated that those safeguards would not apply to data that would be gathered from her new merchant category code measure. As the chair of the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Griffith allowed representatives of three special interest groups to provide the bulk of the testimony on the bill and field members' questions: Liddy Ballard, State Policy Manager for the Brady Campaign; Tracy Manza Murphy, Executive Director of the Coalition for a Safer Delaware and Coalition Against Gun Violence; and Hudson Munoz, Executive Director of Guns Down America. Hudson Munoz is a former staffer of Amalgamated Bank, where he led the bank’s effort to establish a merchant category code for gun and ammunition stores. The bank describes itself as “the financial institution for progressive people and organizations” and has a record of opposition to firearms businesses. In 2022, it successfully lobbied the International Organization for Standardization to create a merchant category code to categorize gun and ammunition retailers. Rep. Griffith said, “House Bill 45 is truly a law enforcement bill." She said patterns of transactions that her bill would help banks to spot "might flag something, prompting the financial institution to look a little deeper into what these transactions are all about, and then, if necessary, alert law enforcement to this.” Ms. Ballard said that for an individual to be flagged for a suspicious purchase, a specific set of criteria would have to be met. “During a 60-day look back period, all of these things would have to be true. A bank customer transacts at five or more distinct gun merchants, aggregate purchase transactions total $2,500 or more from gun merchants, the number of transactions at gun stores are more than 50% of the total transactions for that individual, and the aggregate purchase amount is more than 50% of the purchases by the customer. This example is something that might indicate that someone is trying to hide or be deceptive about their growing interest and increasing intensity in firearms and potentially amassing a stockpile to commit some of the mass shootings that we’ve seen.” She later added that "this would not impact anyone who is not engaging in nefarious activity.” None of the cited criteria appears in House Bill 45, seemingly giving financial services companies discretion over the composition of this algorithm and determining what trigger is appropriate for alerting authorities. The bill does not contain any indication of what state agencies would be contacted by a financial services company that identified what it determined to be suspicious activity, nor how law enforcement officials would conduct a probe of legal purchases made from properly authorized firearms retailers. Under the legislation, the new firearms merchant code would only be applied to a “federal firearms licensee for which the highest sales value is, or is expected to be, from the combined sale…of firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition.” State Rep. Sean Lynn (D-Dover West) suggested amending the bill to capture firearms and ammunition sales from diversified retailers, like Cabela’s, which this legislation would not cover. State Rep. Frank Cooke (D-South Wilmington) advanced that line of thinking, adding: “Let’s look at [including] pawn shops…to make this bill even stronger, so we don’t exclude anybody.” A merchant code does not identify what items were purchased by a particular individual; it only classifies the type of retailer from which the purchases were made. However, in its current form, HB 45 would apply a new code specifically to retailers who derive the majority of their income from the sale of firearms, firearm accessories, and ammunition, making any purchase identified by the code as likely being made by a gun owner. Jeff Hague, president of the Delaware State Sportsmen's Association, called the proposal an attempt at "backdoor regulation." He also cast doubt on its stated rationale, noting that the majority of guns used in crimes are not obtained from gun stores. His testimony is supported by a 2019 U.S. Department of Justice study of state and federal prisoners who possessed a gun while committing their offenses. It revealed that 90% of these felons did not obtain their guns from a retailer. In written comments provided to the committee, the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation opposed House Bill 45, noting, in part: "Protecting the personal information of sportsmen and women is paramount to the continued success of the time-honored outdoor traditions that Delawareans have long enjoyed. The passage of HB 45 allows financial institutions to distinguish firearm retailers from other retailers, potentially allowing the existence of a list or de facto registry of privately owned firearms in the state." House Republicans on the Judiciary Committee--State Reps. Valerie Jones Giltner (Georgetown), Jeff Hilovsky (Long Neck, Oak Orchard), Bryan Shupe (Milford South), and Charles Postles (Milford North, Frederica)--opposed the bill's release. The measure is now on the Ready List, making it eligible to be added to the House Agenda for a vote. Three states have enacted a law similar to HB 45 within the last year: New York, California, and Colorado. At least 16 states, including West Virginia, Florida, Texas, North Dakota, Mississippi, and Idaho, have enacted legislation prohibiting the use of the code in their jurisdictions.
Media Release: March 7, 2025
Bill Raises New Questions about Gun Control and Invasion of Privacy
Delaware House Republicans
A bill being considered by the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday morning adds fresh fuel to the already heated debates over gun control, governmental intrusion, and the erosion of individual rights. Sponsored by State Reps. Krista Griffith (D-Fairfax) and Mara Gorman (D-Newark), House Bill 45 would require the distribution and use of a new credit card “merchant category code” (MCC) that specifically identifies businesses selling firearms and ammunition. Credit card networks would be mandated to comply by July 1, 2025. Proponents of the measure are framing it as a public safety precaution. They claim that unusually large purchases at such businesses could serve as an early warning system, alerting authorities to the need for investigation. "We must use every tool at our disposal to fight the gun violence epidemic in our communities," said New York State Senator Zellnor Y. Myrie (D-Central Brooklyn), who sponsored a similar bill in the Empire State last year. "For too long, those who facilitate and profit from gun violence have escaped scrutiny. This bill would give law enforcement another tool to pinpoint suspicious purchasing patterns and prevent a tragedy before it occurs." Last fall, New York became the third state to enact the firearm business merchant code, joining California and Colorado. The proposal's impetus can be traced to a 2018 opinion piece by New York Times columnist Andrew Ross Sorkin, entitled “How Banks Could Control Gun Sales if Washington Won’t.” In it, Mr. Sorkin suggested that the finance industry—credit card companies, credit card processors, and banks—“could have more leverage over the gun industry than any lawmaker." In 2022, Amalgamated Bank, which describes itself as “the financial institution for progressive people and organizations” and has a record of opposition to firearms businesses, lobbied the International Organization for Standardization to create a specific merchant category code to categorize gun and ammunition retailers. Opposition to the implementation of the new code delayed its immediate implementation. At least 16 states, including West Virginia, Florida, Texas, North Dakota, Mississippi, and Idaho, have enacted legislation prohibiting the use of the code in their jurisdictions. Opponents say the stated rationale for the bill does not hold up to scrutiny. Writing for the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), Larry Keane noted in a 2022 article that creating a unique merchant code for gun retailers was the first step in a greater agenda: "It was never about gathering data to aid law enforcement. It is, and always has been, a concerted effort to pressure credit card companies to deny lawful purchases of firearms and put every single gun purchaser on a watchlist. Since the federal government is forbidden by law from creating and maintaining a searchable database of gun owners, this task is being outsourced to private industry...[This initiative] is setting the conditions that will allow credit card companies to track, categorize, and report 'suspicious' purchases to law enforcement. This is the definition of an Orwellian society." Jeff Hague, president of the Delaware State Sportsmen's Association, said House Bill 45 will predictably lead to law-abiding citizens being targeted for investigation based solely on their purchasing patterns. The language of Delaware’s proposed law has raised some unanswered questions. One issue is the tightly defined nature of the bill that specifically targets the operators of small gun shops while ignoring larger firearms retailers selling a broader range of merchandise. Under the legislation, “firearms merchant” is defined as a “federal firearms licensee for which the highest sales value is, or is expected to be, from the combined sale…of firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition.” Secondly, the bill does not provide any information on how the data resulting from implementing the merchant code would be used. If enacted this session, the law would take effect October 1. Violators would face a civil fine of $10,000 for each infraction. The House Judiciary Committee will consider the bill at 10:30 Wednesday morning in the House Majority Hearing Room of Legislative Hall in Dover. To watch the proceedings live and potentially participate, use this link for more information: https://legis.delaware.gov/MeetingNotice/33513
LET'S ACT!
CONTACT YOUR SENATOR AND REPRESENTATIVE!
They need to know where you stand!
They need to know they are not fighting these battles alone.
This can come up for a vote
in the House at any time.
DON'T WAIT!
Call your official or use the "Send a Message" links for your officials on our ELECTED OFFICIALS page.
Write a Letter to the Editor
Letter Writing Tips
SPEAK OUT on sussex.gop shares more guidelines and tips for writing an effective Letter to the Editor.
Sussex Media contacts
-
Coastal Point: editorial@coastalpoint.com
-
Cape Gazette: newsroom@capegazette.com
-
Seaford and Laurel Star: mmclure@mspublications.com
-
Sussex Post: sussexpost@newszap.com
-
Coast Press: dcp@dmg.gannett.com
-
The Wave: wave@dmg.gannett.com